Hobby Lobby Contraceptive Case - 910 Words

Hobby Lobby Contraceptive Case In this case, the issue was that through Obama health care it is required that all for-profit corporations provide contraceptive services to all employees. And with this law in place it exempts all religious nonprofit corporations but does not exempt for-profit corporations whether they are religious or not. Hobby Lobby is a for-profit corporation and the owners are very conservative and religious and they feel that they should also be exempt from this health care law because they are against taking a life away. They feel that contraceptives get in the way of a life being born. Hobby lobby founder argues that they are being required to do something that they are against. PUTTING IT ON THE EMPLOYEES One of the main viewpoints discussed in the article was that with the past court cases, they have never discovered a for-profit corporation and/or organization to be religious. And that if they let every company who refuses to abide by this law be exempt because they are a religious company, the government would fall apart. Walter Dellinger, who was a part of the Clinton administration, explained that the employees of hobby lobby shouldn’t have to share the same beliefs as the owners of the company because it’s not like the company is a religious corporation it’s only the owners and they cannot make them feel the same way as them because they are only employees. But Paul Clement, who was a part of the Bush Administration, says that, that is notShow MoreRelatedThe Religious Freedom Restoration Act1309 Words   |  6 Pagesare i.e., religious or secular. Such as in the legal case of Burwell (U.S. Secretary of Health and Human Services) vs. Hobby Lobby. Hobby Lobby argued that they should not have to pay for contraceptives for their employees as part of their healthcare because contraceptives such as the emergency contraception went against their religious beliefs because is an abortifacient. I went into this with an open mind as I really didn’t follow the case at the time and really didn’t know too much about itRead MoreThe Freedom Restoration Act Should Not Be Treated Like People, Let Alone Granted1499 Words   |  6 PagesThe Supreme Court continued the horrible trend of pro-corporation rights. Whether one stands with Hobby Lobby, Inc. and considers this case a success of religious freedom or an intrusion, I see it as the court favored corporation’s rights over personal rights. Female workers should be given the availability to use contraceptives. In 2012, the Supreme Court ruled on the case of Burwell v. Hobby. The case dealt with the free exercise clause under the first amendment and the Religious Freedom RestorationRead MoreApplying The New Framework For Hobby Lobby976 Words   |  4 Pagesof such an assumption, the least restrictive method as a standard can be, but does not need to be applied. Applying the new framework to Hobby Lobby reveals how granting the religious exemption to closely held corporations can not only coexist with the government’s interests of making sure female employees have access to the four controversial contraceptives, but it also best ensures this interest. For the sake of argument, let’s first consider what would happen without the exemption. Closely heldRead MoreHobby Lobby and the Obama Administration964 Words   |  4 PagesThe issue is over Hobby Lobby vs. the Obama Administration. Hobby Lobby has taken a stance against ObamaCare’s contraception coverage. ObamaCare’s affordable health care act, gives employees who are women access to contraceptives such as the morning after pill and IUDs, which the plaintiffs of Hobby Lobby considered to be forms of abortion. The contraceptive coverage in the new Health Care law makes preventative care more accessible and affordable to millions of Americans. This is particularlyRead MoreWe, the Corporations, of the United States of America1442 Words   |  6 Pagesexamining the grasps for corporate power highlighted in the court cases of Sebelius v. Hobby Lobby, Citizens United v. Federal Election, and United States v. Sourapas and Crest Beverage Company. First, it is imperative to comprehend the case of Sebelius v. Hobby Lobby. This court case is still in litigation and pertains to the Fourteenth Amendment, the Affordable Care Act (ACA), religious freedom, and woman’s access to contraceptives. The ACA requires all insurance companies to cover forms of femaleRead MoreAbortion : Women s Private Issues892 Words   |  4 Pagespills are over-the-counter as a back-up plan in case other types of contraception failed, though expensive. III. History of Sexism. The United States, as well as the rest of the world, has had an extensive history of sexism and inequality between men and women. IV. Griswold v. Connecticut. Griswold v. Connecticut is the 1965 landmark case that set the precedent for the right to privacy, specifically for the right to be informed and to use contraceptives between married couples, even though the wordRead MoreGlobal Warming Should Be On Birth Control785 Words   |  4 Pagesby Burwell v. Hobby Lobby (Guttmacher) (Planned Parenthood). In 2014, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of Hobby Lobby in the case of Burwell v. Hobby Lobby â€Å"that owners of some for-profit, private corporations can deny coverage of birth control to their staff because of their personal religious beliefs,† (Planned Parenthood). This has implications for employees of the companies who wish to exercise this new right in that they now either must pay out of pocket for pricy contraceptives or simply goRead MoreThe Impact Of Burwell V. Hobby Lobby1796 Words   |  8 PagesImpact of Burwell v. Hobby Lobby In September 2012, Hobby Lobby filed suit against the U.S. government to exempt itself from the contraceptive mandate of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA). Hobby Lobby’s owners are evangelical Christians who believe that the contraceptive mandate violates their religious beliefs; specifically, that life begins at conception when successful fertilization occurs within a prospective mother. Providing contraceptive measures, in Hobby Lobby’s view, wouldRead MorePublic Trade Companies Shouldn t Be Able For Claim The Same Rights Essay836 Words   |  4 Pagesto certain individual freedoms; we all know that, so it’s nothing new. However, the freedom of religion, along with many other rights, ae things that I see being abused very often and that, to me, is a massive issue. Various corporations, like Hobby Lobby and Chick Fil-A, are using these individual rights or freedoms as reasons to deny services to anyone they see fit. These companies should n’t have the right to deny service to anyone with unjust cause, even if it coincides with their religion. ThisRead MoreThe Universal Declaration Of Human Rights1774 Words   |  8 Pagesbroached, and the associated cases that are centered on both sides of the issue will be discussed. While most health related policies and laws aim to protect the health of women, some serve to impede access to health services and cause harm to women through a lack of access to care. The issue of women s autonomy and ability to make their own reproductive decisions has been a polarizing subject since the dawn of the women s rights movement. One of the landmark cases for reproductive rights is Roe